Skip to contents

Alternative Tunings Overview

Unless you’re into alternative tunings, your first question is probably “Alternative to what?” Of course, that depends on what culture you call home. But for most Americans and other native English speakers, most Europeans, and mass-market popular music creators and audiences nearly everywhere, music is tuned to 12-tone equal temperament, abbreviated as “12-TET”. You will also see this tuning referred to as “12-EDO”, which stands for “twelve equal divisions of the octave.”

So what are the alternatives? There are two main sources of alternative tunings:

  • Other cultures, and

  • Music theorists / composers / instrument builders / performers within the ancient Greek / Italian / French / German mainstream (with nationalist enhancements!) that now uses 12-EDO. For brevity we’ll call those “Western theoretical tunings”.

Other cultures

Notable examples of tunings from other cultures are Indonesian gamelan tuning, South Indian carnatic music, and various makams from Ottoman music. You can find detailed analyses of gamelan tunings, as well as Thai classical tunings and numerous theoretical and practical tunings in (Sethares 2013). The first edition of this book (Sethares 1998) is the book that sent me down the alternate tunings rabbit hole in 2001.

Western theoretical tunings

Numerous tunings and temperaments have derived by theorists, composers, and performers over time. This happened first as steps along the path from ancient Greek music to 12-EDO claiming the dominant market share it has today, and later as a counter to said market share.

In some cases, instrument builders constructed moderately complex instruments that used these tunings. It was the desire to mass-produce musical instruments, especially the piano, that led to the widespread adoption of 12-EDO as the standard.

There are two main types of such alternative tunings in use today:

  • Equal divisions of a period, usually the octave, and

  • Just intonation.

Brief guide to tuning and scales

Before moving onward, we need to define some concepts. Pitches are (sort of) the musical name for frequencies. Frequencies are the rate at which some string or air column or reed or membrane or loudspeaker or other physical object vibrates.

Frequencies are designated in cycles per second, called Hertz and abbreviated Hz. The typical range of human hearing is 20 - 20,000 Hertz, but not all of that range is commonly used in music.

A tuning describes a set of pitches a composer selects from in writing a piece, often dictated by the instruments that will be used to play it. Tunings usually consist of a set of repetitions of a scale. A scale is a set of pitches in ascending order of frequency.

The most common tuning of this type is equal divisions of the octave with more than twelve notes, generally called “N-TET” or “N-EDO”. For example, quarter-tone tunings are 24-EDO. Musicians create tunings of this kind for a variety of reasons, most often to provide more harmonic possibilities without giving up the ability to modulate to different keys.

Two such tunings that have achieved serious usage are 19-EDO and 31-EDO. If you’re curious about such tunings, function et_scale_table in this package can create scale tables for them, and function keyboard_map can create a mapping for such a scale to a synthesizer keyboard.

Here’s what the 19-EDO scale table and keyboard map look like:

data("edo19_names")
edo19_scale_table <- et_scale_table(edo19_names)
print(edo19_scale_table)
#>     note_name    ratio ratio_frac ratio_cents interval_cents degree
#>  1:         C 1.000000          1     0.00000             NA      0
#>  2:        C# 1.037155    977/942    63.15789       63.15789      1
#>  3:        Db 1.075691    739/687   126.31579       63.15789      2
#>  4:         D 1.115658    627/562   189.47368       63.15789      3
#>  5:        D# 1.157110   1009/872   252.63158       63.15789      4
#>  6:        Eb 1.200103  2333/1944   315.78947       63.15789      5
#>  7:         E 1.244693   1114/895   378.94737       63.15789      6
#>  8:     E#|Fb 1.290939  1553/1203   442.10526       63.15789      7
#>  9:         F 1.338904  1442/1077   505.26316       63.15789      8
#> 10:        F# 1.388651   1297/934   568.42105       63.15789      9
#> 11:        Gb 1.440247  1639/1138   631.57895       63.15789     10
#> 12:         G 1.493759   1077/721   694.73684       63.15789     11
#> 13:        G# 1.549260  2406/1553   757.89474       63.15789     12
#> 14:        Ab 1.606822    895/557   821.05263       63.15789     13
#> 15:         A 1.666524  3893/2336   884.21053       63.15789     14
#> 16:        A# 1.728444  1744/1009   947.36842       63.15789     15
#> 17:        Bb 1.792664   1124/627  1010.52632       63.15789     16
#> 18:         B 1.859271   1123/604  1073.68421       63.15789     17
#> 19:     B#|Cb 1.928352   1884/977  1136.84211       63.15789     18
#> 20:        C' 2.000000          2  1200.00000       63.15789     19
edo19_keyboard_map <- keyboard_map(edo19_scale_table)
print(edo19_keyboard_map)
#>      note_number name_12edo octave_12edo note_name ratio_frac degree
#>   1:           0          C           -1        Bb   1124/627     16
#>   2:           1         C#           -1         B   1123/604     17
#>   3:           2          D           -1     B#|Cb   1884/977     18
#>   4:           3         D#           -1         C          1      0
#>   5:           4          E           -1        C#    977/942      1
#>  ---                                                                
#> 124:         123         D#            9         E   1114/895      6
#> 125:         124          E            9     E#|Fb  1553/1203      7
#> 126:         125          F            9         F  1442/1077      8
#> 127:         126         F#            9        F#   1297/934      9
#> 128:         127          G            9        Gb  1639/1138     10
#>      period_number       freq     cents ref_keyname ref_octave ref_offset
#>   1:            -4   29.31292  2210.526          A#          1         11
#>   2:            -4   30.40205  2273.684           B          1        -26
#>   3:            -4   31.53164  2336.842           B          1         37
#>   4:            -3   32.70320  2400.000           C          2          0
#>   5:            -3   33.91828  2463.158          C#          2        -37
#>  ---                                                                     
#> 124:             3 2605.14722  9978.947           E          8        -21
#> 125:             3 2701.94158 10042.105           E          8         42
#> 126:             3 2802.33234 10105.263           F          8          5
#> 127:             3 2906.45312 10168.421          F#          8        -32
#> 128:             3 3014.44252 10231.579          F#          8         32

Just intonation

The other main class of derived tunings is called just intonation. Just intonation attempts to create perfect harmonies by dividing the octave into unequal intervals using ratios of small integers. For example, the just perfect fifth is 3/2, the just perfect fourth is 4/3, and the just major third is 5/4.

If you’ve heard a barbershop quartet, you’ve heard just intonation. Combination product sets are a form of just intonation.

Combination Product Sets

Combination product sets (Narushima 2019, chap. 6) are just one of theoretician Erv Wilson’s tuning constructs. The current release, v0.5.0, is focused on them, and the ability to play music with them on synthesizers that can be retuned, such as the Korg Minilogue XD, the Aodyo Anyma Phi, and the Ashun Sound Machines Hydrasynth.

References

Narushima, T. 2019. Microtonality and the Tuning Systems of Erv Wilson. Routledge Studies in Music Theory. Taylor & Francis Limited.
Sethares, W. A. 1998. Tuning, Timbre, Spectrum, Scale. Springer London.
———. 2013. Tuning, Timbre, Spectrum, Scale. Springer London.